User talk:Tommycw1

Welcome!

Hello, Tommycw1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Flockmeal 03:26, Nov 29, 2004 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Buffalo Sabres, but we regretfully cannot accept original research. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thanks for your efforts, and happy editing! Yankees76 19:19, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Allentown, Buffalo, New York

Hi, good job with getting something up on Allentown. My goal is to put up articles for every neighborhood in Buffalo. This way, eventually people from all over the city can add the things they want to their 'home' neighborhood page. So, if you have anything more, please contribute!

Your edit to I-190 (NY)

I reverted your removal of Category:Tolled sections of Interstate Highways, which says it is for "current or former toll roads on the Interstate Highway System". --NE2 00:18, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Frederick Law Olmsted

Buffalo State Asylum and New York State Asylum for the Insane were both on the list, and they both go to the same article. Thats why I removed one, and have removed it again. Cornell Rockey 13:10, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion

Don't worry - it will (hopefully) get round to being deleted. Category:Candidates for speedy deletion has 144 articles in it - it is a matter of time. x42bn6 Talk 02:14, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've started a chat with the sysop who turned it down - you can keep watching my talk page and User talk:Kusma (the closing sysop) and keep chatting - I'm off to bed. x42bn6 Talk 01:45, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No big deal. Anyway, blank articles are discouraged and are usually just sent for deletion. Write an article with content or a redirect. x42bn6 Talk 14:23, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

smallest urban area

Hi, I wish you'd take a look at the talk on the Metro Rail talk page. Note that I changed 'city" to "urban area." I realize that I don't have a cite but five minutes of poking around on Wikipedia will illustrate this fact. --Jfruh (talk) 21:19, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, please have a look at the following Wikipedia policy Wikipedia:No_original_research. Basically it says that Wikipedia is not meant as a place for original reseach and it is just a place to collect already researched information that is source from other locations. I understand how you feel, I sometimes have the same feelings about writing 'facts', but unless you can point to a place where this has been published, your "five minutes of poking around on Wikipedia" is original research and not allowed on Wikipedia.

T.C. 11:11, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lumbaart interwiki

Hallo,

I removed the links because the articles were deleted on the Lumbaart Wikipedia. --Head 04:21, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Shelton Square - Church Station

I can understand the confusion regarding the illusion that it was called "Shelton Square" while it was a Metro Rail Station.

I wanted to only comment about the area of Church Station being part of Shelton Square during the streetcar era and not turn it into a huge explanation. I was wrong with the wording.

Please, also refrain from commenting in the way you did in the history section. Wikipedia is to offer a neutral ground and I found your comment offensive and an attack on me. A simple explanation would have been met with a lot more respect.

I have improved greatly on my writing skills since taking this up, and find this site a great outlet to share some of my knowlege.

Best regards...--Allamericanbear (talk) 13:18, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Removing comments

Hi, Tommycw1. Normally, it is preferred that one archive talk pages rather than deleting messages from them directly. Please let me know if you'd like assistance with that. Powers ^T 12:27, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Excessive comments

Tommy, this sort of edit is over the top and completely unnecessary. Please don't do it again. Powers ^T 13:19, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lt, I completely disagree that these are excessive comments. Removing errant edits has become a large task that had been taken up by myself and several others. For a long time we had no way to combat the problem other then simply reverting the (typically anonymous) edits. In desperation, someone has come up the idea of adding comments to the page to combat the problem. This has helped lower the rate of errant additions, but has not eliminated it. I added more comments in an effort to try to drive the message home. I am fine with leaving it out for now, however I will add one additional comment per section with the next errant change.Tommycw1 (talk) 21:41, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I would advise against it. This is not the huge problem you're making it out to be. And besides, if one comment isn't sufficient, 16 comments isn't going to be any more effective. Powers ^T 22:15, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Buffalo NY *Suburban Schools listed in City Page

I think you might be confused. I have not been editing without logging in, and I don't know who "JT" is. Are you sure you left that message for the right person? Powers ^T 15:27, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh LT, don't worry I'm not confused. I've edited my post on your page to fix my typo. This, however doesn't change the fact that you've broken the RFC.

This edit comment is entirely uncalled for. If you're implying (again) that I'm purposefully editing without being logged in just to circumvent something, I take strong exception to the implication. Powers ^T 18:32, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Files listed for deletion

Some of your images or media files have been listed for deletion. Please see Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 April 19 if you are interested in preserving them.

Thank you. -- Common Good (talk) 19:16, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Question about MIL-DTL-5541 Correction reversals

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=MIL-DTL-5541&oldid=542506772 I'm confused by your reversal of the corrections on this topic made with respect to color. I've worked with chem-film/alodyne for many years; Type I or II contribute to color (hexavalent chromium has color, no hexavalent chromium does not), Class has a subtle effect (where it exists; Type I), where the thicker Class 1A increases the density of the color. I would appreciate your "reversal" of the reversal. Engr Dave (talk) 04:20, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Theater Buffalo Metro Rail station

If you didn't notice, I mentioned the fact that Theater (Metro Rail) station was closed. That list really should be reformatted, by the way. -------User:DanTD (talk) 14:56, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ballast der Republik, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rock (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:48, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Heiter bis tödlich, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages German and ARD (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:24, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Buffalo Academy of the Sacred Heart may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

| city = [Eggertsville, New York|Eggertsville]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:53, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Buffalo template

Ok I have removed everything from the Buffalo template that's not within city limits, is this really what you want? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.231.233.247 (talk) 00:39, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Buffalo template

Hey we should try to figure out a way of resolving this template issue, obviously reverting each other constantly isn't doing any good. My view is that if it includes places outside the city, like Darien Lake, Buffalo Niagara Airport and the Walden Galleria then you you have to include Daemen, since it's even closer to the city then those places. If you're going to delete Daemen because it's not in the city, then you have to delete EVERYTHING not within city limits. I tried to do this, but you reverted me.72.231.233.247 (talk) 19:16, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Buffalo template

Eric Ando and I are having a discussion on the talk page about how to resolve the issues we're having with the template. Please join us so we can stop edit warring. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.231.233.247 (talk) 14:27, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

{{unblock|I was following an RFC in place for 5 years and a un-logged in user refused to comply with this RFC. Tommycw1 (talk) 19:21, 10 September 2014 (UTC)}}[reply]

I blocked your account for 25 reverts today in Template:Buffalo, New York. Please read WP:3RR. Whet you were reverting was clearly not vandalism.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:04, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ymblanter: I disagree that this was clearly not vandalism, the non-logged in user 72.231.233.247 continued to try to add a school which is clearly not in Buffalo New York to the template. As stated in the page: there was an RFC in 2009 where this issue was decided. Please see here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Buffalo,_New_York/Archive_3#Not_in_Buffalo and here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Buffalo,_New_York/Archive_3#RFC:_What_schools_should_be_listed.3F The version you have locked in breaks this RFC. Also, please note I had requested semi-protection and was still waiting decision on that. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection#Template:Buffalo.2C_New_York_.28edit.7Ctalk.7Chistory.7Clinks.7Cwatch.7Clogs.29 Tommycw1 (talk) 19:12, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome to post an unblock request and to get the opinion of a second administrator. To me, it looks like a content dispute.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:14, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thank you. You are correct that it is a content dispute, but one that was resolved 5 years ago in 2009 per the RFC I linked above. Can I at least suggest that the version we lock in is the one that agrees with this RFC? Tommycw1 (talk) 19:16, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Right now, I have fully protected it at your version, at least this was the intention.I will get back now to check.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:20, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OK, yes, that is now at the last version that complies with the RFC. Thank you. Tommycw1 (talk) 19:23, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back after your block. PhilKnight (talk) 21:10, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

RFC

You should have told me about the RFC, had I known about it we could have avoided the whole edit war. Still not sure what Darien Lake is doing in a template that's only for the city of Buffalo, it's not even in Erie County. Does the 'city only' rule only apply to schools? I'm just curious.72.231.233.247 (talk) 00:02, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Tommycw1. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Mooglogo.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Mooglogo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:05, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Tommycw1. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Buffalo Water Front & Skyline.jpg

The file File:Buffalo Water Front & Skyline.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:19, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]